[quote user="Cathy Payne"]
Thank you Brian. You seem to understand me. The concept of “weakness” is defined by these men and then bestowed on the enemy with every breath they take.
I find it notable in that Conservaitve passion “the fundraiser juice” is for two distinct groups. The fetus (not here yet) and the dead’s taxes! How you mistreat the preborn and the dead’s money seems to be what makes the Liberal BRAND evil in Conservative eyes.
[/quote]
I’m not following,
what do you mean?
What is the official liberal stance on taxes from dead, pre-born people?
What is the conservative stance?
and how do they differ?
[quote]
And if that fetus grows up into a gay human you can FUNDRAISE again on his demise.
[/quote]
?
[quote]
It is this feature of our guys that makes right wing callers to radio stations NOT want to abolish the money per vote system. Theology will be the ONLY MONIED VOICE LEFT.
[/quote]
we can always make our own theology.
I’m here to assist or lead in that effort.
[quote]
As per design. Many right wing people see the damage in doing this for a continued democracy.
No stats can, no elections canada hmmmmmm wonder what else.
[/quote]
well hopefully local-override politics.
where local laws supersede more generic laws.
So a federal law would simply be a recomended policy,
but a locality can override this in their polity,
having a different law instead.
This is how object oriented computer programming works.
Which be based on biological cells.
Cells inherit traits from parents,
but can make their own redesigns.
[quote]
They are presently selling off prison farm cows (from a self sustaining venture) to subsidize those new prisons. After we build them (just like Ontario) THEN the private profit guys come in. It is a pattern. I think we just bought into the 407 hwy venture federally that some of these guys created provincially. Their theories about trickle down have some weird visual results, if you ask me.
[/quote]
Well clearly it’s trickle up.
http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/files/2009/05/conley_champagne_distribution.png
All the money that is given to the poorest,
always trickles back to the richest.
Remember rich people are the seas and oceans,
poor people are the lakes and ponds.
Rain must fall on the soil,
for money to flow down the land.
For life to grow and flourish.
Social Security (welfare, guaranteed income), is how the Scandenavian countries and Canada are doing so well.
Synchronistically we also are countries with much precipitation all year round.
Admitedly usually more in the summer than the winter.
Wheras the americans, have quite a bit of desert,
and also some of the worst welfare programs.
Coincidence?
Remember money are pieces of paper,
we can be generous with them.
Be glad they accept our shiny paper gifts.
Oh using it amongst themselves!
how they flourish!
It’ll all come back,
governments are rich,
providing products (community centres)
and services (training facilities).
[quote]
I have already been called “a left wing fringe group” by Canada’s leader. Finding a communist who is leftier than me just didn’t seem possible.
[/quote]
left? please use more clearly defined terminology.
spining counter-clockwise doesn’t mean much to me interms of political ideology.
Do you mean to say you support totalitarian dictators (western idea of communism, soviets idea of socialism (united soviet Socialist Republic),
Mind you, Canada is a Socialist Republic with allegedly three voices (con, lib, ndp), where the soviets only had one the misnamed communist party(ndp), though I’d call it the “dictator party”.
or that you support communalism, as in living within intentional communities like those supported by http://ic.org
I’m not sure what direction communalism would be,
er, maybe inwards, or bilocational or polylocational. *shrugs* who knows,
inwards as it’s tiny governments (atom-tribes), bilocational as they can quantum bind, and polylocational since they can network, forming molecules, cells, fungi, plants, animals etc.
why not just describe what it is, instead of vague directions (left right).
Communalism is where people live in a commune,
or a tribe, like we evolve to do, and as atoms do.
so a group between 1(hydrogen proton) and 239 (238 being Uraniums largest known isotope).
I’ve mentioned cell analogies earlier in this thread, they relate.
[quote]
When normal is called radical even I can’t imagine PAST ME.
[/quote]
radical?
Look up radical at Dictionary.com
late 14c. (adj.), in a medieval philosophical sense, from L.L. radicalis “of or having roots,”
oh okay, well in that case congratulations!
Having roots is great for getting water and nutrients.
[quote]
If we move on to those McCarthy tactics only the right wing has “sight”.
[/quote]
please link to preferably video of referenced event.
[quote]
I lived in Montreal when we had a Rhinosauras Party member get elected.
Harper and the bullying manner just seems to bring out extreme.
[/quote]
I’m not sure his manner,
his videos seemed okay,
he’s a little thick in the head,
kinda stubborn in a self-frustrating kind of way,
where he clenches his fist and bites down hard,
but then catches himself and looks around.
I just remote viewed (mind sensed) that,
I don’t recall a particular video where he did that.
Anyhow, if you linked to a video where you thought he wasn’t nice,
displaying it would mean I could react to it,
rather than my psychic remote viewing.